Cheap ASP.NET Tutorial – Difference between ASP.NET MVC 5 and ASP.NET MVC Core 1.0

CheapASPNETHostingReview.com | Cheap and reliable ASP.NET MVC Core 1.0 hosting. Today The best way to learn new technologies is via comparing with the old and find out what has changed. In this post, find out the difference between ASP.NET MVC 5 and ASP.NET MVC Core 1.0 aka ASP.NET MVC 6. The difference list is quite long as ASP.NET Core 1.0 is re-written. The basic of MVC still remains the same and we can say that from coding perspective there aren’t many changes but there are framework level changes, project structure changes, hosting and deployment changes and many more. So let’s dive in.

ASP.NET MVC 5 vs ASP.NET MVC Core 1.0

ASP.NET CORE MVC 1.0 is Cross Platform.
ASP.NET Core MVC 1.0 is Cloud Ready.
MVC + Web API + Web Pages = ASP.NET Core MVC 1.0
ASP.NET Core MVC 1.0 doesn’t need IIS for hosting : Since ASP.NET Core is to cross platform so you can host ASP.NET 5 applications not only on IIS but they can be self hosted or use kestrel web server on linux.
ASP.NET Core MVC 1.0 has inbuilt support for Dependency Injection : ASP.NET Core MVC includes a simple built-in container (represented by the IServiceProvider interface) that supports constructor injection by default, and MVC makes certain services available through DI.
ASP.NET Core MVC 1.0 has a new project solution structure : There is no App_Start, App_Data, Global.asax and root web.config file. App_Start is replaced by Startup.cs and web.config is replaced by appsetting.json. There is also a new configuration system, where JSON is preferred over XML for configuration settings.
Roslyn compiler for compiling code dynamically : Now no need to compile your code, on any code changes that you make. Thanks to Roslyn in memory compilation. Just make changes -> save it and view in browser.
In ASP.NET Core MVC 1.0 “wwwroot” is now place for static files : wwwroot directory in project is for static content like css, Js, images. And it’s the default root of your server. If a request comes in for a static file on disk, if the file is in this folder then it can go back to client. The name can be changed from project.json file.
The new Project.json file defines dependencies, runtime to use, and defines build and publish setup, instead of .csproj file.
Everything is Nuget package in Core MVC 1.0. There is no dll by default.
Bundling and minification is done using Grunt or Gulp, unlike defining bundles in BundleConfig file.
Manage client side dependencies via NPM and Bower.
ASP.NET MVC 5 Child actions are gone. They are now replaced with View Components.
Introduction of _ViewImports.cshtml in Core MVC 1.0 : It provides namespaces which can be used by all other views. In previous MVC projects, this was provided by the web.config file in the Views folder; since the web.config no longer exists, global namespaces are now provided by this file.
Introduction of Tag helpers : Tag Helpers allows to enable server-side code to participate in creating and rendering HTML elements in Razor files.
It also support RESTful style routes with attribute routing : That means you can even declare RESTful like routes like [HttpGet(“Our Route”)] and [HttpPost(“Our Route”)]
In Core MVC 1.0, routes have new [controller] and [action] tokens.
These tokens allows you to reference controller and action names in the route template. These token are helpful when in future if you rename the controller or action, there is no need to update the routes.

Cheap ASP.NET Core 1.0 Hosting Recommendation

Since 2008, ASPHostPortal has been growing into one of the best cheap ASP.NET hosting provider that offer affordable ASP.NET hosting provider. They offer top quality and the latest ASP.NET hosting on their ASP.NET hosting environment.

ASPHostPortal is the #1 ASP.NET web hosting company according to us and millions users. ASPHostPortal is one of top recommended Windows ASP.NET Hosting provider, they provide reliable and cheap ASP.NET Core 1.0 hosting and they have huge support, you can easily contact them anytime you want.

ASPHostPortal has various ASP.NET Core 1.0 shared hosting plan which start from with an affordable price. There are 4 favorite ASP.NET Core 1.0 hosting plans which start from Host One, Host Two, Host Three, and Host Four. Host One plan start with $5.00/month. Host Two start with $9.00/month, Host Three is the most favorite plan start from $14.00/month and Host Four start with $23.00/month. All of their ASP.NET hosting plan allows user host unlimited domains, unlimited email accounts, at least 1 MSSQL and 1 MySQL database.

Customer can always start from their Host One plan and this plan has support latest ASP.NET Core 1.0 hosting. For more information, please visit their site at http://www.asphostportal.com.

Cheap ASP.NET Core 1.0 ( ASP.NET 5 ) why it will replace Classic ASP.NET

CheapASPNETHostingReview.com | Cheap and Relibale ASP.NET Core 1.0 ( ASP.NET 5 ) hosting. ASP.NET Core 1.0 is not a continuation of ASP.NET 4.6. It is a whole new framework, a side-by-side project which happily lives alongside everything else we know. It is an actual re-write of the current ASP.NET 4.6 framework, but much smaller and a lot more modular.

Only recently Scott Hanselman announced the final name will be ASP.NET Core 1.0 after we’ve got to know it under ASP.NET 5, ASP.NET vNext and Project K.

Some people claim that many things remain the same, but this is not entirely true. Those people mostly refer to MVC 6 which is a whole separate framework which can be plugged into ASP.NET, but doesn’t have to. While MVC 6 remains very familiar, ASP.NET Core 1.0 is a big fundamental change to the ASP.NET landscape.

If you are a follower of the live community standups then you might have heard Damian Edwards saying how the team gets a lot of pressure (from above) to get an RTM out of the door. I am not surprised and can understand why ASP.NET Core 1.0 is strategically so important to Microsoft. It is probably a lot more vital to the future of .NET than we might think of it today.

ASP.NET Core 1.0 – What has changed?

A better question would be what has not changed. ASP.NET Core 1.0 is a complete re-write. There is no System.Web anymore and everything which came with it.

ASP.NET Core 1.0 is open source. It is also cross platform. Microsoft invests a lot of money and effort into making it truly cross platform portable. This means there is a new CoreCLR which is an alternative to Mono now. You can develop, build and run an ASP.NET Core 1.0 application either on Mono or the CoreCLR on a Mac, Linux or Windows machine. This also means that Windows technologies such as PowerShell are abandoned from ASP.NET Core 1.0. Instead Microsoft heavily integrates Node.js which can be utilized to run pre- and post build events with Grunt or Gulp.

It is also the reason why things like the .csproj file got replaced by the project.json file and why all the new framework libraries ship as NuGet packages. This was the only way to make development on a Mac a first class citizen.

But Microsoft went even further. Part of a great development experience is the editor of choice. Visual Studio was privileged to Windows users only. With Visual Studio Code Microsoft created a decent IDE for everyone now. Initially it was proprietary software but quickly became open source as well.

There are many more changes being made, but the common theme remains the same. Microsoft is dead serious about going open source and cross platform. Personally I think this is great. All of this is an amazing change and crucial to the long term success of ASP.NET.

ASP.NET Core 1.0 – Why did everything change?

One might wonder why this new direction towards the Mac and Linux community? Why does Microsoft invest so much money in attracting non-Windows developers? Visual Studio Code doesn’t cost them anything, it is unlikely that they will use MS SQL server in their projects and there is a high chance that these web applications will end up somewhere on a Linux box in Amazon Web Services or the Google Cloud Platform. After all these are the technologies which non-Windows users are more familiar with.

My guess is that all of this doesn’t matter for now. The truth is that an ASP.NET developer who cannot be monetized is still better than a non ASP.NET developer. This is particularly very true if you think that the .NET community is shrinking (relatively). This is just my own speculation, but I think Microsoft fears losing .NET developers, which means they are subsequently losing people who are more willing to pay for other Microsoft products such as MS SQL Server or Microsoft Azure.

If you are a .NET developer you might think this sounds crazy, but think of it from a different angle. Windows Desktop application development is slowly dying. There is no denial to that. Left is the mobile market and the web. Windows phones and tablets are still a drop on a hot stone in comparison to the market shares of iOS and Android. This leaves the web as a last resort. Now the web is an interesting one. After Silverlight’s death ASP.NET is the only Microsoft product which competes with other web technologies such as Node, Ruby, Python, Java and more. This is a though battle for ASP.NET, because up until now you had to be a Windows user to be able to develop web applications with ASP.NET.

Lack of portability

In the last few years this problem has become even more prominent with many new languages gaining more popularity and putting ASP.NET into the shadows.

The biggest problem is that the .NET framework and ASP.NET are not cross platform compatible. As a web developer you are writing applications which can be understood by any browser, any OS and any device which is connected to the web. There are no limitations, but with ASP.NET you can only develop from a Windows machine. That doesn’t make much sense when you think about it.

This limitation has an impact on the adoption of ASP.NET on several levels. Recruitment is a good example. There is a massive shortage of good software developers at the moment. Ask Ayende how hard it is to recruit a new talent. Imagine how much harder it is if you limit your talent pool to Windows users only? Not only do you waste more time and resources on the recruitment process itself, but also have to pay higher salaries for developers where the demand is higher than the supply.

It can be difficult for companies which are heavily committed to the .NET stack to change directions now, but what about startups? Many of today’s biggest internet businesses were born out of small startups. They use free open source technologies such as PHP, Ruby, Python, Java or Node.js. This has a double negative effect for Microsoft. Not only did they lose the opportunity to sell ASP.NET, but they also send out the message that if you want to build a successful business you pick an open stack over proprietary software.

ASP.NET is probably one of the feature richest and fastest technologies you can find, but why would a startup care about this in the beginning? If they do well they can deal with this stuff later and if it doesn’t go well then its good they didn’t have to pay for a Microsoft license, right?

Chasing behind innovation

Another major implication of not being cross platform compatible is that current ASP.NET 4.6 developers are missing out on big innovations which are not immediately available on the Windows platform. Over the last years Microsoft was chasing after many innovations by providing its own version to the .NET community, but not always with success (Silverlight, AppFabric Cache, DocumentDb, Windows Phone, etc.). This is not a sustainable model.

As a result many ASP.NET developers live in silos today. We are at a point where Microsoft cannot keep up with the vast amount of technology anymore and ASP.NET developers miss out on big innovations such as containers and Docker and don’t even realize it, because they know very little to nothing about it. This is a dangerous place to be.

Cross platform compatibility is more than just a fad. It is the key to innovation today and the only way to stay on top of the game!

So how does Classic ASP.NET fit into this new world? Not much to be honest. ASP.NET 4.6 has a really though time to keep up with this fast moving environment.

Except we have ASP.NET Core 1.0 now…

ASP.NET Core 1.0 – Reviving ASP.NET

This is where ASP.NET Core 1.0 comes into the limelight. It is built on the same core principles which helped other languages to popularity:

Free and open source
Cross platform compatible
Ease of access
Thin, fast, modular and extensible

On the plus side ASP.NET Core 1.0 can be developed with some of the greatest languages available right now, thinking of C# and F# in particular! This will stick out ASP.NET Core from other competitive frameworks.

What will happen to ASP.NET 4.6? I don’t know, but I would argue that ASP.NET 4.6 is a dead horse in the long run. There is very little value in betting any more money on it. Microsoft wouldn’t say this yet, but it is pretty obvious. ASP.NET Core 1.0 is the new successor and the only viable solution to address the aforementioned problems.

ASP.NET 4.6 will be soon remembered as Classic ASP.NET. It will not entirely disappear, just like Classic ASP has never fully disappeared, but new development will likely happen in ASP.NET Core going forward. I find it extremely exciting and the benefits of ASP.NET Core are too compelling to not switch over as soon as possible.

The only thing we need to hope for is that Microsoft will not become impatient now and mess up the release with an immature product which will cause more churn than attraction. Microsoft, please take the time to bake something to be proud of!

Cheap ASP.NET Core 1.0 Hosting Recommendation

CheapASPNETHostingReview.com | Cheap and Reliable ASP.NET Core 1.0 Hosting recommendation. Somedays ago Microsoft announced that what has so far been ASP.NET 5.0 has been renamed to ASP.NET Core 1.0. Microsoft went this route and made it very clear that this version of ASP.NET is a totally new platform to build applications from and not just a small upgrade as prior upgrades from say ASP.NET 3 to 4 have been. ASP.NET Core is a brand new platform that has been rebuilt from the ground up – all the way to the core .NET platform libraries – to provide a leaner and cross platform implementation on what was ASP.NET. While there is a lot of feature compatibility with older versions, it does not have what you would call code compatibility meaning that you can’t just run your old ASP.NET code in ASP.NET Core without a fair bit of change.

What is ASP.NET Core 1.0?

ASP.NET Core 1.0 is a new open-source and cross-platform framework for building modern cloud-based Web applications using .NET. We built it from the ground up to provide an optimized development framework for apps that are either deployed to the cloud or run on-premises. It consists of modular components with minimal overhead, so you retain flexibility while constructing your solutions. You can develop and run your ASP.NET Core 1.0 applications cross-platform on Windows, Mac and Linux. ASP.NET Core 1.0 is fully open source on GitHub.

With ASP.NET Core 1.0 we are making a number of architectural changes that make the core web framework much leaner and more modular. ASP.NET Core 1.0 is no longer based on System.Web.dll, but is instead based on a set of granular and well factored NuGet packages allowing you to optimize your app to have just what you need. You can reduce the surface area of your application to improve security, reduce your servicing burden and also to improve performance in a true pay-for-what-you-use model.

Cheap ASP.NET Core 1.0 Hosting Recommendation

After doing ASP.NET development for years, we have used many asp.net hosting services in our projects. Best ASP.NET Hosting below are the cheap ASP.NET Core 1.0 Hosting in our list, who offer their customers with fast & reliable solutions at an affordable price.

ASPHostPortal.com - Cheap ASP.NET Core 1.0 Hosting

ASPHostPortal

^$1.00

Host Intro

/mo

Host 1 Site

1 GB Disk Space

10 GB Bandwidth

0 SQL Server db

SQL Server 2008/2012/2014

0 MB SQL Server / db

0 MySQL db

0 MB MySQL /db

50 MB Email Space

ASPHostPortal

^$5.00

Host One

/mo

Host Unlimited Sites

5 GB Disk Space

60 GB Bandwidth

2 SQL Server db

SQL Server 2008/2012/2014

200 MB SQL /db

3 MySQL db

200 MB MySQL /db

200 MB Email Space

ASPHostPortal

^$9.00

Host Two

/mo

Host Unlimited Sites

15 GB Disk Space

150 GB Bandwidth

4 SQL Server db

SQL Server 2008/2012/2014

500 MB SQL / db

6 MySQL db

500 MB MySQL /db

500 MB Email Space

ASPHostPortal

^$14.00

Host Three

/mo

Host Unlimited Sites

50 GB Disk Space

500 GB Bandwidth

6 SQL Server db

SQL Server 2008/2012/2014

1000 MB SQL / db

10 MySQL db

1000 MB MySQL /db

1000 MB Email Space

Choose the Cheap Web Hosting for ASP.NET

The site is designed to help people find the best and cheap ASP.NET Core 1.0 hosting solution at an affordable price. All above ASP.NET hosting providers are Microsoft Golden Hosting partners, which means your websites will be hosted in a server which are maintained by a group of Microsoft experts. And their price are also affordable to most people. So, to choose the right one for your site.

ASPHostPortal.com

ASPHostPortal.com is one of the leading providers of ASP.NET Core 1.0 hosting services for providing complete strategy to your cyber problems concerning web hosting, e-commerce and cloud hosting working throughout 24×7. This year group commemorates 10 years of the successful existence. The most important plays a part in this success happen to be authentic and relevant solutions of questions pertaining with web, service of experts, friendly customer services and finally the final although not least reasonable charges for qualitative services.

The key reason utilizing web hosting services of ASPHostPortal.com is it provides consistent and protective web hosting services through the use of beautifully shaped data centre that results severance and backup system up to 100%. Every one of these services are finished by team of professionals who are experts in their respective fields and are dedicated to deliver better of remarkable ability.

However, most of them would realize later that finding the cheap ASP.NET Core 1.0 hosting is not as simple as finding a reliable shared hosting. So how people can choose their web hosting? In addition to company reputation, speed & uptime performance into consideration, people should also check the following factors carefully.

Operating System

At present, both Windows Server 2012 and Windows Server 2008 are perfect operating systems for ASP.NET hosting. Integrated with IIS 7.0/7.5/8.0, they have excellent support for .NET and ASP.NET MVC. If the hosting solution does not offer Windows Server 2012 or 2008, people really have to think twice before signing up.

Trust Level

Normally, ASP.NET trust level directly determines what permission an ASP.NET website has in a server. Ensure the hosting provider supports full (at latest medium) trust level so people could use and install almost any web applications without troubles.

.NET Framework

Choosing a great ASP.NET hosting, it is quite important that the hosting solution contains the newest and most stable .NET framework like ASP.NET 2/3.5SP1/4.5/5 that can assure people run any programs, and avoid compatible issues.

ASP.NET MVC

ASP.NET MVC is an open source web application framework that implements the MVC (model-view-controller) pattern, which uses interface-based contracts allowing each component to be easily tested independently. But not every web host offers this great feature, people would be better ensure it is included when selecting ASP.NET hosting.

Control Panel & Support Service

For ASP.NET hosting, Plesk is the most suitable and easy-to-use control panel that is able to meet the requirement of users. Some hosts also offer WebsitePanel or self-developed control panel to customers

Simpan